According to a new study, taking in just a single 16 ounces of beer or normal glass of wine a day might start to shrink the general volume of the brain. That is not all, the damage deteriorates as the quantity of daily drinks rises.
As per the study which was published by America’s journal ‘Nature’, on average, people at age 50 who drink a 16 ounces of beer or 6-ounce glass of wine (ie. two liquor units) a day, particularly in February 2022 had brains that seemed two years more seasoned than the people who just drank a portion of a brew (one unit).
Shockingly, the brains of people that age who said they drank three liquor units daily had decreases in both white and dark matter that looked as though they had added 3.5 years to the periods of their minds.
One liquor unit is 10 milligrams or 8 grams of unadulterated liquor. That implies 25 milligrams or a solitary shot of alcohol is one unit; a 16-ounce jar of lager or juice is two units; and a standard 6-ounce glass of wine (175 milligrams) is two units.
Notwithstanding, the brains of nondrinkers who started drinking an average of one alcohol unit daily showed what could be compared to a large portion of an extended time of aging, according to the study. Comparatively, drinking four alcohol units daily old people’s brain by over 10 years.
But, a few researchers find this study a problem. They say- – “It’s not linear”.
“A problem in this study is that they only have information on people’s drinking habits for the one year prior to the (brain) imaging,” said alcohol researcher Emmanuela Gakidou”
A professor of health metrics sciences at the University of Washington also said she has a doubt.
She further communicated that, this is a major limitation of the study as it’s likely that the cumulative consumption of alcohol throughout one’s lifetime is associated with the brain, not just the level of consumption right before the images were taken.
She thinks the relationship between alcohol and health is complex, and our understanding of that relationship is evolving over time. Based on this study, Emmanuela says she would not really draw any definitive conclusions, but would say that the authors have identified areas for further research.
Doctors used to believe that moderate measures of alcohol could give a medical benefit, particularly to the heart and the brain, however the new study has raised doubt about that supposition.
A number of studies have found no amount of drinking to be healthy, and the World Heart Federation recently published a policy brief saying there is “no level of alcohol consumption that is safe for health.”
Other health experts have also said that, small amounts of alcohol are associated with health benefits for some conditions, such as ischemic heart disease and diabetes, but harmful for others, such as road traffic accidents and breast cancer, stroke and others.
Researchers have revealed that, there isn’t really a simple answer for a given individual, but they are all based on whether small amounts of alcohol are beneficial or harmful for an individual. It also depends on that person’s health status and their risk profile.
Extreme Drinking And Heart Diseases In The UK?
An analyzed data from in excess of 36,000 individuals who participated in the UK Biobank study, which houses top to bottom hereditary and wellbeing data on in excess of 500,000 middle aged grown-ups residing in the United Kingdom.
People in the study had provided information on the number of drinks they had each week in the previous year and had undergone an MRI brain scan. Researchers compared their scans with images of typical aging brains and then controlled for such variables as age, sex, smoking status, socioeconomic status, genetic ancestry and overall head size.
Be that as it may, the researchers say, their study is by far the largest investigation of the topic. It uses a general population sample, and it controls for more confounds than before. As such, it provides overwhelmingly more evidence than any previous investigations and gets us closer to settling the debate.
Some school of thought are also of the view that, the authors are overinterpreting the discoveries of their findings and reaching inferences that are not really supported by what is presented in the paper. They say they don’t see a critical pattern in their diagrams, thus they aren’t convinced by the conclusion.